Main Article Content

Abstract

This study presents a fluid-structure interaction (FSI) analysis of a low subsonic aircraft wing under cruise conditions. Using computational fluid dynamics (CFD) coupled with structural finite element analysis, the lift and drag coefficients, wing deformation, and structural stresses were simulated over a 5-second interval with a 0.1-second timestep. The simulations revealed that the lift and drag coefficients converged to 0.136 and 0.0456, respectively. Maximum wing deformation was recorded at 4.78 mm, and the highest stress was 2.765 MPa. A calculated safety factor of 309.78 confirms that the wing structure remains well within safe limits under the specified aerodynamic loading. These findings validate the structural integrity of the wing during steady cruise and underscore the effectiveness of FSI simulation in evaluating aeroelastic performance forces

Keywords

Fluid Structure Interaction Low Sub-Sonic Wing Lift Coefficient Drag Coefficient Safety Factor

Article Details

How to Cite
Jayadi, M. . (2025). The Transient FSI Simulation for Aeroelastic Evaluation of a Low Subsonic Wing in Cruise Flight Regime. Jurnal Teknologi Kedirgantaraan, 10(1), 89-98. https://doi.org/10.35894/jtk.v10i1.259

References

  1. U. Cella, Setup and Validation of High-Fidelity Aeroelastic Analysis Methods Based on RBF Mesh Morphing, M.S. thesis, Università Degli Studi Di Roma “Tor Vergata,” 2015.
  2. T. Theodorsen, “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the mechanism of flutter,” NACA Report, no. 496, 1936.
  3. F. Benra, H. J. Dohmen, J. Pei, S. Schuster, and B. Wan, “A comparison of one-way and two-way coupling methods for numerical analysis of fluid structure interactions,” Journal of Applied Mathematics, vol. 2011, pp. 1–16, 2011, doi: 10.1155/2011/853560.
  4. D. A. Priyanto, “Simulasi interaksi fluida dan struktur sayap kepak,” Undergraduate thesis, Dept. Teknik Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, 2013.
  5. B. Junaidin, “Numerical simulation of flexible wing of HALE UAV using two-way fluid structure interaction method,” Undergraduate thesis, Dept. Teknik Dirgantara, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Indonesia, 2014.
  6. L. Zhang and C. Sun, “Simulation analysis of fluid-structure interaction of high velocity environment influence on aircraft wing materials under different Mach numbers,” Sensors, vol. 18, no. 4, p. 1248, 2018, doi: 10.3390/s18041248.
  7. V. Vigneshwaran, S. Vijayaraghavan, G. Sivamanikandan, M. K., K. Keerthana, and K. Balaji, “Fluid-structure interaction over an aircraft wing,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Development, vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 27–31, Apr. 2017. [Online]. Available: www.ijerd.com
  8. M. Ezkurra et al., “Analysis of one-way and two-way FSI approaches to characterize the flow regime and the mechanical behaviour during closing manoeuvring operation of a butterfly valve,” International Journal of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–15, 2018.
  9. A. A. Kumar et al., “Fluid-structure interaction analysis of a cropped delta wing,” in Proc. 12th Int. Conf. on Vibration Problems (ICOVP), 2016.
  10. J. W. Bristow et al., “Safety factors in civil aircraft design requirements,” Engineering Failure Analysis, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 459–470, 2007.
  11. ASM Material Data Sheet, “Aluminum 2024-T3,” MatWeb, [Online]. Available: http://asm.matweb.com/search/SpecificMaterial.asp?bassnum=ma2024t3 [Accessed: Nov. 28, 2021].
  12. M. F. Nita, Aircraft Design Studies Based on the ATR 72, Hamburg University of Applied Sciences, 2008.